- Comment on the Richard Montague interview here
- Who should be recruited in January? Read this excellent recruitment doc from member ARLukomski
- PoN member McPie asks have we progressed under Martin Paterson? Join the conversation here.
- PoN member theAnticlough poses a new set of questions about the team, click here.
- Notts confirm Belshaw signing
- ๐๐ป Welcome the newest members of Pride of Nottingham! Drop by and say hello, itโs always great to see fresh faces joining the community. ๐ซฑ๐ผโ๐ซฒ๐ผ
- ๐ Check out our activity stream to see the latest content as it happens live. Join in with the conversation on Pride of Nottingham.
- Got thoughts on Notts? Share them and help Pride of Nottingham hit its content target! ๐
- Reply to and read discussions without leaving your screen. Check out the Pride of Nottingham 'Topic Feed', which brings you all the latest content from our community forum in one place.
Everything posted by Super_Danny_Allsopp
-
Match Discussion: Game 35 - The Pirates (H)
I think that team is too attacking myself, but if we're gonna lose, might aswell lose with a bit of style rather than lose with defensive boredom and a chorus of boos.
-
Match Discussion: Game 35 - The Pirates (H)
Loach Atkinson Hollis Hewitt Adams Campbell Noble Aborah Banton Stead McLeod Oh Stanley Aborah!
-
Match Discussion: Game 34 - The Daggers (H)
If true.
-
Match Discussion: Game 34 - The Daggers (H)
Loach - fantastic and honest interview. Maybe he should give his manager a bleeding powerpoint on how to interview?
-
Match Discussion: Game 34 - The Daggers (H)
Sorry, I gave JF a chance, but enough is enough. JF OUT. Absolutely terrible, hanging on to a draw at home against the bottom side. Shocking, shocking stuff. Is this gonna be Ray Trew's parting gift? Get us relegated again? Should never have been appointed, get JF out ASAP before we are playing conference football!!
-
Match Discussion: Game 34 - The Daggers (H)
If we can't beat these under JF, then we have to worry about relegation as long as JF remains in charge. Moniz would have destroyed them and entertained at the same time, I doubt we will be seeing that under JF.
-
Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
I'm not having a dig at you, I just think calling him direct names won't help. You can call his actions or words moronic/idiotic etc... but directly at him? Bit far for me, but each to their own.
-
Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
You might not like JF, many don't, but let's try and leave the insults out of it.
-
Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Expected, sadly. It's a sad day when losing to Accrington Stanley, despite a mini fight back, that it comes as absolutely no shock.
-
Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Because his tactics (at home) are historic?
-
Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Aborah has told fans differently. He told fans the manager doesn't like him, so he would like to leave.
-
Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
- Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
As usual, we'll be celebrating/being depressed whilst trying to decipher what Colin is saying in the Chat Room. http://prideofnottingham.co.uk/fans/match_chat- Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Pipe down you- Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
@Modern Fan 1862 ???? Lol, No. Just no.- Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Who knows. Pure silence coming from the club, must be due to changes in Media Team?- Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Same team, with Mackenzie in for Atkinson, as expected. Sigh.- Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
What I would like to see: ----------Loach--------- -Atkinson-Hewitt-Hollis-Milsom- -------Thompson--Aborah-------- ---Campbell----Noble-------Burke- --------------Stead------------------ What I expect we will see is the same as the last home game.- Match Discussion: Game 29 - The Minstermen (A)
- Match Discussion: Game 29 - The Minstermen (A)
Rubbish. Well done to Morecambe- Match Discussion: Game 29 - The Minstermen (A)
Banton has been signed. NO ABORAH - EVEN ON THE BENCH. ADAM CAMPBELL DROPPED?!- Match Discussion: Game 29 - The Minstermen (A)
Hoping for all 3 points as always, COYP!- Match Discussion: Game 28 - Pools (H)
Have to win really. Not just for points, but to get the fans on side. A boring 0-0 or a 0-x loss won't cut it.- Match Discussion: Game 27 - The Hatters (A)
I don't think I've (intentionally at least) taken anything out of context, maybe misinterpreted, but that's something else entirely. As you say, I don't think we will agree, but thanks for sharing your views/insight anyway, much appreciated. Agreed, that's part of football though, if a manager wasn't well received by the fans they will tend to be less patient when things don't work out. Regardless of our opinions at the time, we have to get behind the team and the new manager, 6 points from 9 is not a bad start at all.- Match Discussion: Game 27 - The Hatters (A)
I'm not questioning the signing or quality of Mcleod - I thought it was a decent signing. However, if the aim is to be self sustainable, spending 150k on a striker the wrong side of 30 isn't a great way to do it, IMO. Saying that it isn't a loan is neither here nor there - by that logic Man City could be self-sustainable, provided their super rich owners pump enough money in and it's not in the form of loans. I don't think many were criticising JF directly. How could we? On his appointment we knew next to nothing about him. The criticism was aimed at the type of appointment. If at the end of the season, Moniz still wasn't up to the task, it would be then understandable for the club to appoint a 'novice'. However, the reasons given for sacking Moniz was to 'not let the club stagnate' (i.e promotion)... so then the appointment of such 'novice' (and not necessarily JF, ANY novice) seemed ridiculous, hence the backlash. It's all about timing. Furthermore, labeling JF a novice isn't criticism, it's a fact. No first team managerial experience = novice. You stated club loyalty. You didn't state who the loyalty was intended for, hence the clarification. I'm not against 'hiring a novice'. As already stated, it's the timing.... and the reasons given for sacking the previous manager. Again, they don't add up. Whilst I do think that Derry could, and maybe will elsewhere, have come good, the issue again is more the timing. Sacking him at such a stage didn't make sense, unless his replacement was a Martin Allen kind of manager. It wasn't, and it failed. That's easy for me to say with hindsight and knowing the eventual outcome, but I think if Derry was sacked in Jan, it maybe would have been more understandable. Either that, or let him try and survive until the end of the season. Sacking him when we did, if not last gasp, what was it?! - Match Discussion: Game 32 - Stanley (A)
Important Information
Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.