I think there is an evolution in the approach that Notts has taken under Reedtz. I think initially the focus was just to support the manager and become familiar with the club. Using the knowledge introduced to identify players who would give us a solid footing going forward.
The likes of Damien McCrory arriving was very promising, and I think he was somewhat underrated because he did contribute to the stability the club needed to move forward, as did the arrival of Sam Slocombe, who was easily the best keeper we had during our National League years. No player will avoid mistakes; I think even Elisha Sam showed the club's willingness to make the wage budget work.
Each season in the National League, even now we have seen a steady improvement in the focus of those we signed. Players like Lewis Macari, with a great level of potential, could have been missed if Luke Williams hadn't given him time. Additionally, he made significant strides in his development under the guidance of Stuart Maynard. Earlier in the season, I remember writing an article about how Macari didn't want to miss a game and how he felt he had improved.
This is a significant thing for me in recruitment; we are identifying players who can come in on loan, but then when they establish themselves, we do try to buy them. So, there's a real incentive for a player to do well, especially if they want regular football. I could say the same about Kyle Wootton, as I have Macari. I didn't think we would sign him permanently at the time, and when we did. It showed that we are stronger in negotiating with clubs, whereas before it seemed impossible.
We then give them a platform to showcase their ability, and develop them, and this is resulting in the club managing to attract fees. I used to feel we had a culture of giving players away 'cheaply' and whilst some might feel we didn't get good money for Macaulay Langstaff, I do feel the club took his age into consideration and how much he wanted to try life out in the Championship.
When you recruit players who give their all, bring success and play a part in the feel-good factor, I am less disappointed when they leave. Whereas I don't like how Dan Crowley left us. I think all his reasons and excuses are disrespectful.
The positives in the recruitment are that we can weed out players whose heads get turned; we are not afraid to sell and then reinvest. Importantly, the recruitment doesn't come at the cost of development off the pitch; they go hand in hand. So, all that nonsense about 'The Nest' when we were struggling a bit just seems daft and ungrateful, given the direction we are heading.
Our improvements with recruitment are the biggest reason why we are having success and moving forward as a club. If we want to retain this ambition, or even reach the championship, then the focus needs to be exactly as we see it now.
It's certainly been much better, but at times we have made poor decisions, which will happen. Some of the poorer signings do come down to the players themselves, so I do agree with earlier comments about Will Randall. Yet despite the good, I do think it's wasteful signing players for a fee and never really giving them a fair chance. While others seem to be treated much better.
Obviously we don't know why this is, what happens behind the scenes, or on the training ground.
Yet there are baffling signings, which will always happen in football because no club has perfect recruitment 90% of the time. I do feel the resources we have in the budget to buy players should only be spent when we are prepared to fully invest in that player - something I don't think we have done with the likes of Junior Morias.
Despite all this, we are a million miles away from the guessing games and gimmicks that we have seen. Hardy loved signing players with whom he could pal up with. Before that, every season we had a fresh gimmick, and that never brought stability. Right now, we are establishing a squad and doing what I have always felt was best. Those days when, each season, we would end up with a virtually new squad or tied to players who don't offer anything, are long gone.
Which is one positive for mutually agreeing on release terms with players, but it is a waste of time for both parties.