David Conn article

On 23/12/2016 at 19:18, Elite_pie said:

I wonder if we will learn them?  As has been mentioned above none of the figures seem to add up.  I think everyone puts in their own personal bias on the numbers, but what seems apparent is that we can't seem to be competitive on our gate income alone, even though it is respectable for this level.  We need a certain degree of owner 'investment' to stay solvent.  That's why I find it hard to be overly critical of the Trews.  While it's true that many of our problems have been caused by Ray's poor decisions and appointments, he has (until recently) made good any shortfall.  I just hope the takeover goes through without problems and both Alan Hardy and the Trews are mutually satisfied.  If that happens, then it's over to you Big Al to write the next chapter in our eventful history.

The club is desperate for transparency, provided Hardy has not signed any agreements against it. He should release some of the facts that haven't been all that forthcoming under the club as things stand now. There are many things which we should know, I do not care about the finer details but I do think some of the things that has been hidden from public knowledge should be known. This includes how so much debts have been allowed to run up.

We learned more about Munto Finance because of Ray.