Every candidate that may have showed interest in the job would have been FULLY briefed about what the job entailed & what would have been expected.

It is very doubtful that a shortlisted applicant would have turned down the job after a final interview.

If they weren't interested an applicant would never have got to the final interview.

It's obvious that the best person who got to final interview got the job.

It's a very good interview which gives us fans a better insight; the questions were surprisingly good, and it was nice to see points followed up on. I don't think the board would have appointed Martin Paterson just because some rejected working with the new setup. Not with the way the announcements came through, it seems like they had their man in mind and wanted to strengthen around him.

Andy Edwards is the more interesting part of the discussion, with him having experience within the England U20s, U19s, and U16s teams.

Has anyone explained how they ended up being paired together?

The club is in safe hands because the Reedtz brothers are building it up with better stuff and changes behind the scenes.

At first, they worked on making things better on the pitch. Now for the last few years, they've also been improving things off the pitch. That helps us get ready for promotion and makes the club stronger.

What they’re doing now will help in the future too. Instead of waiting until we’re in a higher league, they’re sorting things out bit by bit already.

It might feel slow to some fans, but that’s how football works sometimes.

I thought the interview was really good. I’m glad we’ve got owners who use the media properly.

Even though it would’ve helped to have the interview earlier when we were getting a new head coach, I still liked it.

Maybe just a short and honest update would’ve helped stop the silence.