7 hours ago, AmericanPie said:

I am hoping we sign Sheehan rather than a striker.

Yet a rumour has emerged via the grape vine that Aileen Trew has speculated that a signing has been made, who is awaiting to be announced by the media team.

the grape vine is wrong. I never said any such thing.

I've no idea where most of these rumours come from! I think they are designed to get people wound up about things that aren't happening. Norty

3 hours ago, hissingdwarf said:

Not sure Sheenan adds as much to the team now as most think he does. If left back is vacant then fair enough, but as a centre back?  Good cover and better than the choices at the beginning of the season, but now the window is open, surely the scouting has found more suitable options for centre back to partner Bennett.

I think Fullarton will play Bennett as a midfielder for a little while longer.

22 minutes ago, Wilfordpie said:

I think Fullarton will play Bennett as a midfielder for a little while longer.

Admittedly I was abit shocked last week when he did but this could work well in away games, I'm not afraid to admit I used to follow Man United very closely in the past and Phil Jones played the same sort of role in the champions league, man marking players like Ronaldo, yes Phil jones is worse than Scott Bennett but I think this could work well in terms of breaking down opposition attacks

Wilford and Stanley...I hope you are not confusing the need for a defensive set up for away games to what we need as a more offensive approach when at home.

Sheehan ain't signing with us because it would of happened by now that's why Adams has been called back to fill in left back.

Maybe now Milsom could go into the middle with Curtis noble aborah take you're pick but me personally I like energy in the middle Curtis gives that and so would Milsom.

were as at home I think we can't play defensive we should be more offensive as we have been and getting goals just need to be more organised at home etc.

 away from home yea be more negative in terms of more defensive Nick it on the break at home no put you're foot down and take charge 

2 hours ago, Piethagoram said:

Wilford and Stanley...I hope you are not confusing the need for a defensive set up for away games to what we need as a more offensive approach when at home.

Not at all, my way of thinking was that Bennett would only play central midfield in away games where as you say we need to be more defensive, at home I think we should keep the back 4 the same but have a free-flowing attack

1 hour ago, 1862 said:

Sheehan ain't signing with us because it would of happened by now that's why Adams has been called back to fill in left back.

Maybe now Milsom could go into the middle with Curtis noble aborah take you're pick but me personally I like energy in the middle Curtis gives that and so would Milsom.

were as at home I think we can't play defensive we should be more offensive as we have been and getting goals just need to be more organised at home etc.

 away from home yea be more negative in terms of more defensive Nick it on the break at home no put you're foot down and take charge 

I would hope that Sheehan would still be coming but JF wants to give Adams a chance, admittedly Sheehan didn't help the defence that much but he is experienced and class at left back

I'm positive I read on the Bradford argus we was suppose to sign him last week but we ain't signing him now and he has other league two offers.

i don't think we will be signing him that's why Adams has came back maybe to either A cover for Milsom or B move Milsom in the centre of the park no idea how this will pan out 

15 hours ago, AmericanPie said:

Yet a rumour has emerged via the grape vine that Aileen Trew has speculated that a signing has been made, who is awaiting to be announced by the media team.

1

Nah, did you get this off Twitter? It doesn't come from the horses mouth directly, take it with a pinch of salt.

Grape vines are only good for wine, not rumours.