Jump to content

Was it or wasn’t it a penalty?


Fan of Big Tone

Recommended Posts

Supporter+
Posted

Looking at this picture he’s standing outside the penalty area but his arm is inside, the ref had a good view, to me it looks as if he made the right call. What do others think?

Where the 7 minutes came from is another matter.

E335F767-15E8-4154-8FB8-13FDF566F818.thumb.jpeg.377134075bc264cdefeba82dbd6decee.jpeg

Posted
Looking at this picture he’s standing outside the penalty area but his arm is inside, the ref had a good view, to me it looks as if he made the right call. What do others think?
Where the 7 minutes came from is another matter.
E335F767-15E8-4154-8FB8-13FDF566F818.thumb.jpeg.377134075bc264cdefeba82dbd6decee.jpeg


Penalty. Nolan does himself no favours with his blaming of referees when things don’t go Notts’ way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Supporter+
Posted
1 hour ago, ivansneck said:

 


Penalty. Nolan does himself no favours with his blaming of referees when things don’t go Notts’ way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I agree, he seems obsessed with talking about the referee after every game, even when the interviewer tries to steer him away from the subject to talk about the game itself, he goes back to discussing what in his opinion are poor refereeing decisions, he also seems to be getting more and more agitated on the touchline, challenging every single decision and in the 4th officials face every time.

I do hope he isn't going to turn into Steve Evans mark II. Incidentally did anyone see how Nolan got a bloody nose when celebrating our goal, he had to send someone to the dressing room for some tissue to stick up it. I suppose he's passionate that's one thing.

Posted

If the ball hit him and it didn't make movement then it's one of those difficult call, I'm not worried about the decision and I didn't see it so I can't really comment.

Posted

Because the arm was inside the box, I think it is a penalty. The question is why the ref allowed play to go on past the seven-minute mark. This ain't rugby.

Posted
52 minutes ago, Joe Jones said:

The question is why the ref allowed play to go on past the seven-minute mark. This ain't rugby.

The referee can add additional minutes regardless.

I believe we started flapping around with subs, yet time can be added for any valid reason - time wasting, subs, fouls, bookings, injuries etc. It's basically the match officials discretion as to how much time he allows the game to run over.

Posted

i could not tell seeing it live but the ref had a good view, its history. im pretty over it tbh.

Posted

Nailed on penalty, I was in the family stand and couldn't believe what I'd seen as it was no threat at all. I also wasn't surprised to see the seven minute board as I guessed eight with all of the niggly things going off in the half, plus one long stoppage as well. 

It was our own fault really as we should have carried on the same way as the first, but sat back and invited them on for the last part of the game as we always seem to do.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About PON

Pride of Nottingham

Pride of Nottingham is an independent fansite devoted to Notts County, the world’s oldest professional football club. Created in 2013, it has served as a source of Magpie news, features, match previews, reports, analysis and interviews for more than three years.

Support PON

Enjoy our content? Want to help us grow? Your donation will go a long way towards improving the site!

donate-pon.png

Meet the Team

Chris Chris Administrators
super_ram super_ram Global Moderators
DangerousSausage DangerousSausage Global Moderators
CliftonMagpie CliftonMagpie Global Moderators

Social Media

×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.