Jump to content

Match Report: Magpies’ Dominance Undone by Port Vale’s Clinical Counter


PON_News

Notts County faced a frustrating afternoon at Meadow Lane as they fell 0-1 to Port Vale.

The Magpies dominated possession with 72% of the ball, but they were unable to turn that control into goals.

Despite early pressure and several chances, Notts County's efforts were ultimately thwarted by a resilient Port Vale defence and an outstanding performance from goalkeeper Connor Ripley.

The match started with Notts County on the front foot, applying pressure and pushing high up the pitch.

Dan Crowley and Kellan Gordon looked dangerous early on, working the ball into wide areas and delivering crosses into the box. Alassana Jatta came close on multiple occasions with headers, but the finishing touch eluded him, with one attempt in the 27th minute flying over the bar.

However, it was Port Vale who took the lead against the run of play in the 23rd minute. Lorent Tolaj managed to find space in the box, finishing off a well-placed cross from Ronan Curtis.

The goal came as a blow to Notts, who had been enjoying the lion's share of possession but were caught out by Port Vale’s quick counterattack.

The goal did little to dampen Notts County's intensity, as they continued to press forward. Crowley tested Ripley with a right-footed shot from outside the box, but the Vale keeper was equal to the task, making a save to his bottom right.

Despite their dominance on the ball, the Magpies struggled to break down Port Vale’s well-organised defence, which remained compact and disciplined throughout the match.

In an attempt to turn the tide, head coach Stuart Maynard introduced Cedwyn Scott, Josh Martin, and Robbie Cundy as second-half substitutes, hoping to add fresh legs and height to the attack.

The changes nearly paid off, as Cundy connected with a header in the 90th minute that forced another fine save from Ripley. Notts County continued to launch balls into the box, but Ripley and his defenders stood firm, clearing any danger that came their way.

The second half saw Notts County’s frustration grow, with a number of fouls breaking up the flow of play.

The Magpies committed eight fouls and picked up three yellow cards in total, while Port Vale were penalised thirteen times and had four players booked, underscoring the physical nature of the contest. Both sides battled fiercely, but neither could find a way through in the closing stages.

The Magpies had six corners compared to Vale’s three, and although they created several set-piece opportunities, they couldn’t find the finishing touch.

Port Vale, on the other hand, managed to make the most of their limited possession, holding firm in defence and looking dangerous on the break.

As the final whistle blew, the home side was left to rue missed chances and the outstanding display by Ripley in the Port Vale goal.

The defeat brings an end to a challenging afternoon at Meadow Lane, with Notts County left to regroup and focus on the finishing that had served them well in previous matches.

Join the conversation on Pride of Nottingham and share your thoughts on Notts County's narrow 1-0 defeat at Meadow Lane - what do you think went wrong?

Who was your Man of the Match against Port Vale? Head over to Pride of Nottingham and let us know who you feel deserves the title!



Share your PRIDE with PON! Visit our Community Forum

Join us - Discuss - Write for us - Debate - Contact us


Member Feedback

Recommended Comments

liampie

Posted

i thought notts were the better team, but it was a repeat of gillingham where we just did not create a good enough chance to get back into it this time round. we had something more about us against gillingham, but there was not enough quality on goal. its not the end of the world, we can regroup but the results at meadow lane need to improve and notts must play teams like port vale/gillingham in a way where we can get more efforts on goal.

  • Like 7
  • Love 6
Robbie

Posted

I think that Notts were the better side over the 90 minutes, & Notts had several chances in that first half, that another day would have gone in.

Apart from the goal, I thought that Notts were comfortable in defence apart from the last few minutes when they were pushing up trying to get an equaliser.

We have to bear in mind that Notts were without 4 of their best players, Jones, Edwards, McGoldrick & Grant, & they were clearly missing today to get that cutting edge, which was not there.

If you look at the table it looks like teams are beating each other, & Notts are still in the mix just one point behind Walsall, who are top 

Notts just need to keep battling and get through to the new year, there or there abouts near the top, then hope to get Jones, Grant & Edwards back, plus a new striker in the transfer window to boost their promotion push.

  • Like 4
  • Love 9
upthepies

Posted

At the end of the day, we need something extra up top and a striker who can finish chances outside the penalty box. Notts can try to walk the ball into the goal or score from a cross, but it won’t always work. Defensively, we need to be more alert in crucial stages. The Port Vale goal changed things for Notts. I think we would have scored if they hadn’t. I never felt we would equalise after that. I’m disappointed but see things we can take away.

  • Like 3
  • Love 10
allardyces tash

Posted

Notts needed David McGoldrick today. I don’t know why we are so afraid to test the keeper from distance. The passing is encouraging at times, and our midfield is one of the best, but we didn’t play to Jatta’s strengths enough. He didn’t look like he would change things. It’s not his fault; it’s how we attacked as a team. He’s not a striker who involves himself non-stop until he pulls a chance off. You have to provide him with the chance to score by playing him into threatening areas.

  • Like 6
  • Love 7
thommo

Posted

I wish we had scored before they did. I think it would have ended 1-1. The game had a draw written all over it, but Notts lacked sharpness on goal today. In a different scenario, Notts could have won, and that’s the disappointing part about the result. Kellan Gordon looked good, with some decent crosses, but Jatta was isolated most times and unable to involve himself.

  • Like 9
  • Love 4
NiftyNick

Posted

I feel disappointed that Notts never really tested the Port Vale keeper. We forced him to make one or two good saves, but those efforts went straight at him.

  • Like 11
Wheelbarrow repair man

Posted

From what I can gather reading all the Comments on here and other HYS sections, this match was full of What If's . Like what If Notts had scored in the Opening 20 minutes, What If Notts had tested the Port Vale Keeper more, What If Dan Crowley played further Forward. Well they Didn't in Answer to the First two Questions and He Didn't in Answer to the third. I Believe the Magpies had 70% of the ball during the game, that doesn't Matter come the Final Whistle Port Vale had a Goal to their Name and Notts Didn't, so they get the Three Points. If their Goal was Offside (obviously the Ref didn't think so) that's why he gave it, we can sit here and Debate the Match, but whatever we say or write isn't Going To Change The Match Result. We just have to Hope Lessons have been Learned. Such has Notts need to play Four At The Back, Dan Crowley needs to push up and Not play so  Deep and Jatta needs support and Not  just be left on his own to toil Up Front.

  • Like 5
  • Love 5
OoooooTommy

Posted (edited)

I don’t know how Port Vale fans can be happy with their performance, even with the 1-0 win. They were poor and missed an open goal. That summed them up as a team, but they defended better. Then again, they parked the bus at every opportunity and tried to put every player behind the ball. Notts needed to be a lot more clinical on goal.

Edited by OoooooTommy
  • Like 5
  • Love 2
Blake

Posted

I’m disappointed by the outcome. I thought Notts looked good, but the defending for the goal was poor. I wish the players would continue until fouls are given and make sure we don’t allow teams to have easy chances, offside or not.

  • Like 6
CliftonMagpie

Posted

Good match report. I wish we had more attacking options on the bench because the game could have been turned around. We don’t need to panic, but some fans are worried about the impact on the Chesterfield game. If we win that, the worry will be for nothing. We need to work on being less predictable in front of goal.

  • Like 6
Joshua

Posted

The result wasn’t what we deserved. I think a draw would have been fair, but if Port Vale had taken their only other clear chance, I don’t think we could have come back from that. We’re doing well though, with plenty of games and points still to be earned. I understand the disappointment, but let’s focus on the positives, we can work harder to score from the chances we did create. I still believe we can compete with the top three, so let’s make sure we get the maximum points against Chesterfield and keep pushing forward.

  • Love 5


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

About PON

Pride of Nottingham

Pride of Nottingham is an independent fansite devoted to Notts County, the world’s oldest professional football club. Created in 2013, it has served as a source of Magpie news, features, match previews, reports, analysis and interviews for more than three years.

Support PON

Enjoy our content? Want to help us grow? Your donation will go a long way towards improving the site!

donate-pon.png

Meet the Team

Chris Chris Administrators
super_ram super_ram Global Moderators
DangerousSausage DangerousSausage Global Moderators
CliftonMagpie CliftonMagpie Global Moderators

Social Media

×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.