Moniz had to go because he was a fish out of water in League Two. It just wasn't happening for him, the defence was leaking goals and were losing too many games. But what any individual with common sense and logic would have done is hire a manager with experience of the lower leagues. It's hardly rocket science is it? But no, we had to once again take the Yoko Ono experimental option for the FOURTH TIME IN A ROW by hiring an individual with no experience of English league football. Hiring Fullarton was the final straw.

I was finding it hard to defend Moniz at the time but I do feel we could have afforded giving him the remainder of the season.

Fullarton came in and did well, winning away from home but the merit he earned - he quickly lost and I honestly didn't feel it was the right decision to hire him in the first place. I would have gone for experience, as play-offs was a possibility - yet settling down the squad, reducing its size and getting someone in who knows this division would have made sense. Perhaps allowing Moniz to part wasn't an incorrect decision, provided knowledgeable and steady leadership followed.

The current unrest could have been completely avoided.

4 hours ago, notts-joe said:

The current unrest could have been completely avoided.

I would use the word postponed, rather than avoided. 

5 hours ago, Super_Danny_Allsopp said:

I would use the word postponed, rather than avoided. 

I'd use 'avoided' myself, considering the club was in talks to be sold in November allegedly.