On 11 May 2017 at 17:38, Super_Danny_Allsopp said:

Comments in the video are along the lines of:

- Left because Rodwell and the Trews forced him out. Was told by the kit man when he wasn't given the number 9, manager never said a word.
- Kevan talked to him last season but Trews blocked it
- 'Someone' would say things such as 'we would love to have you back', but LH knew they were saying the contrary as soon as his back was turned (no prize for guessing who the 'someone' may be).
- LH is so glad they've gone.
- Game and goal against Juve the highlight of his career.
- Player/manager at Worcester. AH promised a pre-season friendly against them at ML.
- Still thinks he's capable of playing at L2 level even at 41.
- Trews left Juve game at HT in a sulk because they weren't allowed into the posh box after the game. 

I've not seen the video but there's a few inaccuracies there, if you're at all interested?

The then manager chose the squad numbers and the first the Board knew of the reallocation of the no 9 shirt was when Hughesie talked to them about it. A totally unjustified move. And my view is that he shouldn't have left in the first place. We didn't leave at half time, but just before the end as we had a disabled person with us at Juve and they wanted to avoid the crush. 

What is relayed to players by management teams is often put in such a way that the board is blamed for others decisions. Cowardly, but commonplace.

The Trews are actually 2 people. Each an individual.   Take all this as you will, of course!

 

On 11 May 2017 at 17:09, liampie said:

i am surprised more people who they stomped on and treated unfairly have not said more things about them publicly, its where our local media should have done more investigating but they just want to have a cushy life.

Maybe they weren't stomped on or treated unfairly and that's why they haven't gone public? Just a thought?

3 minutes ago, Patsypie said:

Maybe they weren't stomped on or treated unfairly and that's why they haven't gone public? Just a thought?

how do you fee about the lady pies mysterious poster?

On 12 May 2017 at 14:15, Chris said:

Probably more so for those who didn't know, seems the kind of thing to expect from a certain party.

I recall people saying Lee had asked to leave after finding out and had issued sick notes, the whole thing seem to be one of those ironic plots that should never have happened. Sometimes people do things to be vindictive mind.

What are you talking about, Chris? Who is the "certain party?'  What "sick notes?"   

12 minutes ago, liampie said:

how do you fee about the lady pies mysterious poster?

What do you mean?

Just now, Patsypie said:

What do you mean?

well they have folded and its believe to be because of the way they was ran, i just wondered how you felt about that injustice?

11 minutes ago, liampie said:

well they have folded and its believe to be because of the way they was ran, i just wondered how you felt about that injustice?

Well, I feel that there are many people out there who want to believe the spin. Other people can make up their own minds. I've been involved enough to know how people operate. Each to their own and good luck to them, if they feel that's what they need to do.

Just now, Patsypie said:

Well, I feel that there are many people out there who want to believe the spin. Other people can make up their own minds. I've been involved enough to know how people operate. Each to their own and good luck to them, if they feel that's what they need to do.

do you feel the mens team would have been relegated if the club had not have been sold?

11 minutes ago, liampie said:

do you feel the mens team would have been relegated if the club had not have been sold?

It's 2 separate teams. There's no correlation. So, no

Just now, Patsypie said:

It's 2 separate teams. There's no correlation. So, no

thank you.

12 minutes ago, liampie said:

thank you.

No problem. 

On 5/11/2017 at 18:09, liampie said:

i am surprised more people who they stomped on and treated unfairly have not said more things about them publicly, its where our local media should have done more investigating but they just want to have a cushy life.

I think there are probably a few with more than a couple of choice words they'd like to say. Lots of people after leaving Notts have alluded to certain things.

However if you are in a job, or you're applying for jobs, it never looks good when you criticise your former employers, no matter how bad they were. I'm sure in 5, 10 years time it will all come out in books etc... 

 

16 minutes ago, Super_Danny_Allsopp said:

I think there are probably a few with more than a couple of choice words they'd like to say. Lots of people after leaving Notts have alluded to certain things.

However if you are in a job, or you're applying for jobs, it never looks good when you criticise your former employers, no matter how bad they were. I'm sure in 5, 10 years time it will all come out in books etc... 

 

and theres a couple of former employees who have spoken out. Anonymously, of course, though vociferously. You'd be surprised at the power of them to spread discontent to a willing audience. It doesn't mean to say that what a disgruntled ex employee says is truth, but it does save face with a future employer.

And maybe books will be published. I've seen a couple already with gross inaccuracies...because unless you are actually there, you simply couldn't know what's happened. It's par for the course and really doesn't concern me too much but I do have a strong sense of justice and have no time for lies.

20 minutes ago, Patsypie said:

lies.

You should threaten legal action. 

17 minutes ago, Super_Danny_Allsopp said:

You should threaten legal action. 

If people choose to live their life telling and believing lies, that's up to them. I've no intention of suing anyone unless it directly harms my family. I have a life to live and don't need you to tell me what to do when you mean nothing to me.