Excellent discussion @menzinho, out of interest which of the trialists would you sign or want to see Ardley take on?

Nathan Tyson must surely be on the to sign list, he's done very well and doesn't appear to be the typical 37 year old.

9 hours ago, Countyman said:

Excellent discussion @menzinho, out of interest which of the trialists would you sign or want to see Ardley take on?

It’s always hard to judge players over a couple of games and I only saw the Ipswich game, we played well but it was your typical professional friendly, I’d have liked to seen how the trialists got on against Alfreton/York which seemed more representative of our games to come.

I think Tyson would be really useful in the NL, he’s definitely looked sharp. I think NA wants a target man as well which could mean we’re a bit striker top heavy especially as we’re in desperate need of defenders.

Speaking of which I liked Kelly-Evans, I just wonder if his height (or lack off) will be where teams look to expose him. McCrory looked okay, but Burton fans think he’s too good the NL. He was a newer trialist so can only assume he was a couple of weeks behind on fitness compared to the rest of the squad. I think on past reputation alone he’d be a great signing.

Those 3 stand out for me (And Jim O’Brien – technically a trialist as well, we know what he can do!)

It’s a shame we haven’t had many 6ft bruiser centre backs in, I think this has to be the priority going into the start of the season…

Height and pace is required, left back, centre backs and another quality winger outside of what Notts have been looking at. Not heard a lot of positives by players on trial in the CB position.