The club has done this in the past; it didn't work then, and I don't believe it would now. I would hope that it does have benefits, but from my experience it just leads to being unproductive. I wish that this could work, and that supporter groups are treated equally, and that they put aside any differences to serve us fans better. Under Alice Kelk, I personally felt my presence wasn't respected. I got kicked out, then re-asked to take part.
I soon decided, like many others, that it wasn't worth the hassle or my time, though my intentions were only to help the club.
I personally didn't want to be all that involved, though some sought access to the board level, and I don't like that idea. The point of the committee was to represent the fans, provide supporter feedback, work in harmony, and assist the club with fan-related initiatives. Though most meetings were pointless, and my treatment greatly saddened me.
I had a very good understanding with Sarah Gooding, who first started the committee idea, and even though those original meetings seemed pointless. It was nice to see groups at the same level, and it seemed promising, but they just stopped and started. Once Sarah left, Alice eventually resumed it, and I don't think my issues stemmed from her. Yet to be removed from the list, to be told it was a mistake, considering how involved I was, just made me realise my effort and time would never be appreciated.
Whoever comes in as the chair needs to avoid silly disagreements and start with a plain canvas, without taking sides or listening to past gossip, because it does not help the future.