Highlights : Wimbledon v Notts

[Piethagoram]

 

[liampie]

the highlights dont make it clear enough but the pen was the right decision, rawlinson should have kicked the ball out for a throw in. he played bostock into danger but it was a silly challenge as he never played the ball. we played so well to get back into the game, only for the second penalty to be given which again i have no disagreement about. their player was being held back by crowley. that was even more stupid of a decision because you cant hold a player like that, but its all from panic and poor judgement. very annoying and disappointing.

[lambleypie]

The performance was subpar, to say the least. We crafted some fantastic goals, but they were sadly overshadowed by our abysmal defending. It simply wasn't up to scratch, and I'm at a loss as to why we faltered so badly.

[Piethagoram]

Actually, I wonder if there is footage on their 1st penalty from another angle? Rawlo should not have been playing left back.... I'm not sure Bostock actually fouled the guy, just a convenient leg to collide with and fall over?

[Chris]

2 hours ago, Piethagoram said:

Actually, I wonder if there is footage on their 1st penalty from another angle? Rawlo should not have been playing left back.... I'm not sure Bostock actually fouled the guy, just a convenient leg to collide with and fall over?

It looked clear to me in those highlights, unfortunately, whilst the contact seemed minimal - I do believe the correct decision was made.

The AFC Wimbledon player doesn't seem to be going down at this stage and falls naturally to me, watching the footage slowly, I believe there's enough contact. I also watched an AFC Wimbledon fan vlog that showed Sam Slocombe as an unsung hero with the relentless one on one's he had.