I was the first person who spoke to Stanley after the game, he kindly posed for a photo for my son and I did speak to him.

Let him and the club battle it out. Yet I think we would see much of a difference if we tried to include him, I said to JJ before bumping into him - 'we won't win at home until Stanley Aborah returns to midfield' we are just lifeless without him. He offers drive to go forward, much of which sadly Alan Smith doesn't. Alan Smith was very poor from a defensive point of view but he tried.

I really need to walk that way round, I'd love to meet Stan myself but I never go that way

But I agree he really needs to play!

Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk

@notts-joe Good comments from you. My biggest fear is that Jamie has obviously made up his mind about Stanley, and Jamie is too dictatorial to accept that he is wrong. We need Stanley's quality and that is what us punters will pay good money to see. I feel cheated today, never felt at such a low ebb after today's non performance. I still wish and sincerely hope the Trews succeed in getting Notts moving upwards. However, I feel for the "economic effect" of today's game will affect future match revenues with disenfranchised supporters not returning to pay good money to see such garbage.

2 minutes ago, ohstanleyaborah said:

 

Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk

The real question is - what in God's name is a Wileyfox Swift when it's at 'ome?

@Piethagoram Jamie needs to accept that certain players can help, perhaps if he allowed them do what they 'know' they can do - rather than expecting players to play his way/style. It's a bit of give and take, anyone half interested in football will know you have to listen.

Several fans have made good comments about him refusing to make changes because he's stubborn etc.

If true, it will result in only one thing and if he holds any desire to be successful - he will have to reflect on his decisions. I will say, I do feel it's harsh to blame JF, he needs an assistant (very important) and he only applied for the position. He needs time to correct things, he's learning whilst on the job (just like Derry) and he will make mistakes. Many of which might not be repeated twice, yet the same could be said about Moniz.



Just attached the above to show people I'm not a clown that makes things up.

Yet I do believe Stanley is the type of player the majority in this division would envy us to have within their own team.

2 minutes ago, ohstanleyaborah said:  

Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk

The real question is - what in God's name is a Wileyfox Swift when it's at 'ome?

Something from the future

Sent from my Wileyfox Swift using Tapatalk

@Piethagoram Jamie needs to accept that certain players can help, perhaps if he allowed them do what they 'know' they can do - rather than expecting players to play his way/style. It's a bit of give and take, anyone half interested in football will know you have to listen.

Several fans have made good comments about him refusing to make changes because he's stubborn etc.

If true, it will result in only one thing and if he holds any desire to be successful - he will have to reflect on his decisions. I will say, I do feel it's harsh to blame JF, he needs an assistant (very important) and he only applied for the position. He needs time to correct things, he's learning whilst on the job (just like Derry) and he will make mistakes. Many of which might not be repeated twice, yet the same could be said about Moniz.

Just attached the above to show people I'm not a clown that makes things up.

Yet I do believe Stanley is the type of player the majority in this division would envy us to have within their own team.

I now fear Stanley will leave us due to Fullerton not liking him, he cares and wants to play for us and he's outstanding but if the manager doesn't like him we can't do anything, unless the fans chant for Stanley at every game I can't see it changing

@ohstanleyaborah Derry did well to 'gut' his County of unwanted players, people hard to manage or control.

Yet, some of which really made me say "one day, he will have to learn to work alongside these people". I think the same can be said and applied to Jamie Fullarton, which I believe if he don't re-evaluate he will leave. I will say he did seem disappointed and eager to play for this club, not many British players with his talents would have this respectful approach to the game.

I also don't believe he's here for money, not remotely.

well, let's hope for some sensible "clear the air" and head bashing together. Hoping Stanley can be at Stanley come Tuesday for a win.

@Northants Pie... you may well have a point in that Stanley could be difficult to manage. 

edit... I realise that we cant keep sacking managers, so am prepared to give Jamie time to sort things out..but there has to be more openess and togetherness to succeed, we all want Notts to achieve COYP

14 minutes ago, Piethagoram said:

well, let's hope for some sensible "clear the air" and head bashing together. Hoping Stanley can be at Stanley come Tuesday for a win.

@Northants Pie... you may well have a point in that Stanley could be difficult to manage. 

But that is what a 'manager' is paid to do...

12 hours ago, Piethagoram said:

well, let's hope for some sensible "clear the air" and head bashing together. Hoping Stanley can be at Stanley come Tuesday for a win.

@Northants Pie... you may well have a point in that Stanley could be difficult to manage. 

edit... I realise that we cant keep sacking managers, so am prepared to give Jamie time to sort things out..but there has to be more openess and togetherness to succeed, we all want Notts to achieve COYP

The thing is though, how many players have been difficult to manage over the years? Lee Hughes has to be the biggest one the that springs to mind and even Charlie McParland could get the best out of him, the only one who didn't him also bored us to death at home.

People have been talking about if Cooper or Sheridan had the same record as Fullarton we as fans wouldn't be so angry, the people saying that surely cannot believe for one second that either of the aforementioned would have dropped Stan nor played hoofball nor only had one shot on target in 120 mins of football nor sat back letting their own ego get in the way of making substitutions

@Northants Pie I have just listened to Jamie's interview on Magpie Player....

My thoughts:

1. "Best team to win the game over 90 minutes"... I would counter to say best team not to lose the game over 90 minutes

2. ..consideration to use of subs....   One can only think his bench is not considered good enough, hence he doesnt use the subs

3..playing Noble out wide...... Jamie hints that he likes the Curtis / Smith combination in the centre?  I am sorry Jamie, but you are very wrong there

4. An opportunity to say some words on the Stanley situation.... Nothing to allay fears over a departure?

3 minutes ago, Piethagoram said:

@Northants Pie I have just listened to Jamie's interview on Magpie Player....

My thoughts:

1. "Best team to win the game over 90 minutes"... I would counter to say best team not to lose the game over 90 minutes

2. ..consideration to use of subs....   One can only think his bench is not considered good enough, hence he doesnt use the subs

3..playing Noble out wide...... Jamie hints that he likes the Curtis / Smith combination in the centre?  I am sorry Jamie, but you are very wrong there

4. An opportunity to say some words on the Stanley situation.... Nothing to allay fears over a departure?

In other words the puppet masters have yet to inform their puppet of their views so to allay any punishment from said masters he comes out with the same deluded bollocks that is always going to further the divide between fans and manager.

The only one thing he knows for definite is that one puppet master didn't sign Aborah and therefore wants him gone so he can at least confirm the rumours, albiet in a backward fashion without the fear of reprisal 

13 hours ago, ivansneck said:

But that is what a 'manager' is paid to do...

My point exactly

why did we extend his contract and make a big thing of it despite it turning out to be a clause in his contract??