Jump to content

Super_Danny_Allsopp

Global Moderators
  • Current Mood

    No Mood Set
  • Posts

    2,678
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    89

Team Member

Super_Danny_Allsopp belongs to the Team group.

Super_Danny_Allsopp last won the day on February 6 2023

Super_Danny_Allsopp had the most liked content!

4 Followers

About Super_Danny_Allsopp

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

22,997 profile views

About Super_Danny_Allsopp


  • User Group: Global Moderators


  • Member ID: 155


  • Rank: Grand Master


  • Content Count: 2,678


  • Content Post Ratio: 0.65


  • Reputation: 2,508


  • Achievement Points: 18,095


  • Member Of The Days Won: 89


  • Joined: 07/08/13


  • Been With Us For: 4150 Days


  • Last Activity:


  • Currently:


Super_Danny_Allsopp's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular
  • Conversation Starter
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

2.5k

Reputation

  1. None. Burn them all in the depths of hell.
  2. Difficult to pick. Nobody was terribly but most average. Tsaroulla too for me.
  3. Great move for him and so pleased he played well on his debut. Keep it up Ryley
  4. I think you missed the sarcasm bit but ok. You can boil this down to a very basic argument. If the renewable energy sources were as cost effective and reliable as the more traditional sources, every country in the world would be clambering over eachother to implement it. This includes left and right, it's basic economics at the core. Why aren't they? Why do they have to be convinced and persuaded to even pay lip service to it? It's either because they're deluded morons that want to destroy the Earth - OR - it's because the renewable sources aren't as economically viable as you're conveying. I'm willing to bet it's the latter. I don't care if you believe in climate change or not - or more importantly as to what extent you believe humans are responsible for it, to be honest this isn't my area of interest nor something I've studied at length - but you do not destroy your economy to virtue signal when the rest of the world isn't doing the same. It's madness. You invest in the people and fund research, scientific advancement, engineering... To get you technologically to the point where net zero is not only economically prudent, it's financially profitable. That is capitalism.
  5. All you need to know
  6. ANDREW NEIL: Starmer wants to tell us what to eat, what to drive and how to heat our homes. His climate change obsession will be his downfall | Daily Mail Online WWW.DAILYMAIL.CO.UK The Prime Minister went in person and mob-handed to impress on everybody how Britain 'leads the world on climate...
  7. I think it says more about fairgameuk than it does Notts. I'll be taking a mental note to disregard anything they say in the future, for or against Notts or otherwise.
  8. I don't think this is fair. You post almost exclusively from one viewpoint, Robbie is your antithesis.
  9. I stopped paying into the 'big' charities a long time ago. I still donate to select charities, but you can also be more targeted in donating to community hubs and the like - it does require a bit more research on your own part though.
  10. Good for Jatta and good long-term for the club (having internationals being developed in house). Short-term it leaves us extremely light. I guess there is no word on Scott coming back? McGoldrick still out? Brown's performances certainly have improved recently, but every time we have seen him in the 1 up top alone, he looked lost.
  11. Great footballer. Good MOTD host. Shame he had to constantly bring his political baggage with him everywhere he went. You only have to look across the pond to see how the general population takes to pandering from multi millionaires and billionaires completely out of touch with the everyday person.
  12. Good run out for the youth, fringe players and those returning from injury. Ness looked impressive. Brown wouldn't get a game for the B side on that showing.
  13. Chicksen is a good player. He's probably fairly comfortable being a L2 fullback. The issue is he doesn't really fit into our system. He's not really physically dominant enough to be a starting LCB, but he's also not attacking enough to be a wing back in the way we play.
  14. That's all well and good if I was giving Maynard a rating for the season. I wasn't. It was for this one particular game.
  15. I don't think it is. We've played 2 decent/ steady league 2 sides at home, We've lost them both in a very similar fashion. "He played what he thought was his best eleven" - well of course he did!!! It'd be weird if he wasn't. He played an abundance of defensive midfielders in forward positions, while playing an attacking player deep in midfield. Resultantly, we failed to create chances. Our game plan never changed all game, swing balls into the box and it wielded almost nothing, we never changed it. None of the substitutes had any impact on the game.

About PON

Pride of Nottingham

Pride of Nottingham is an independent fansite devoted to Notts County, the world’s oldest professional football club. Created in 2013, it has served as a source of Magpie news, features, match previews, reports, analysis and interviews for more than three years.

Support PON

Enjoy our content? Want to help us grow? Your donation will go a long way towards improving the site!

donate-pon.png

Meet the Team

Chris Chris Administrators
super_ram super_ram Global Moderators
DangerousSausage DangerousSausage Global Moderators
CliftonMagpie CliftonMagpie Global Moderators

Social Media

×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.