Notts's current and latest predicament leads me to reflect that we should perhaps have stuck with Derry.
I said at the time that his tenure could finally ignite some positivity around a club that has been mired in gloom for years.
I was a short-lived season ticket-holder but I got tired of the abuse and general misery issued forth by those sat around me (and I changed seats once) - it was almost as though people went there to vent negativity. At the ref, at the players, at the opposition. (Perhaps this is modern football in general and I'm naiive.)
Derry, whatever his managerial naivity and rookie status in that regard, really got the place united. Who was the last Notts manager who had their name sung from the stands? Even when we were getting roundly wallopped by such footballing giants as Walsall, the song rung out.
But no, the magerial merrygoround went on, and that rarely ends well, as has proved. Derry might have taken us down that season when he got fired, and I'm no chief executive so I don't know if the financial implications of that were too hard to countenance; but I would sooner have kept Derry and continued to build a vibe, a brand, a unity, and gone down, than jump ship to someone who was parachuted in and had no rapport with fans (Moniz) or, now, Fullerton, whose appointment was somewhat staggering.
Good vibes and positivity count for a lot. Yes, we might have gone down (probably would have). Yes, he had a stupidly large squad that needed settling down and trimming. Yes, he slipped into an unfortunate habbit of sounding embattled and defiant in his post-match interviews. But give Derry a few seasons and I reckon we could have had a happy little era at Meadow Lane. It's an opportunity missed, and now look how he's doing at Cambridge.
So, am I alone in this view? #flameme
This topic's posts are not available currently. Please try again in a few minutes.