Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The issue is that when a bigger club expresses interest in a player and the club refuses to negotiate, they weaken their position if the player decides to run out his contract. I would imagine that if the offer is lucrative, Harrogate should have accepted it or asked for a reasonable amount.

  • Like 6
Posted

Honestly, I think they could find better options. I think Luke Armstrong is beneath FL standard and only tends to do well in teams where he's seen as an important player. Where there's better quality, he shows for the lack of standard.

  • Like 5
Posted

He is highly overrated; his scoring form has only been notable with Carlisle and Harrogate. Wrexham is pursuing players who won't provide long-term strength to the team. In League Two, he is merely average, so why would he perform better with a team aspiring for Championship football? He is the kind of player we would have desired prior to the arrival of the Reedtz.

  • Like 5
Posted

Wrexham appears to have a strong determination to enhance their attacking prowess. However, it would be wise for them to also assess their defenders and midfielders, as these areas play a crucial role in providing a solid foundation for the forwards to thrive. By bolstering the quality in these positions, the team can create a more conducive environment for their attacking players to excel and make a greater impact on the game.

  • Like 3
Posted

harrogate need him more than wrexham. i fully understand why they are in no rush to sell him.

  • Like 2
Posted

Some players are worth holding onto.

  • Like 1
Posted

Harrogate Town will do well to retain Luke Armstrong during the next window. While I believe he would be a good League Two player, I think that’s about his limit. I’m surprised that Wrexham are interested in him.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm certain that we might have overlooked a target or two. The main difference between us and Wrexham is that they have released a significant number of players and are in need of strengthening. On the other hand, we didn't have to do this as much, so I'm not too concerned about them failing to secure new signings. If anything, it could be seen as a fortunate situation for us.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About PON

Pride of Nottingham

Pride of Nottingham is an independent fansite devoted to Notts County, the world’s oldest professional football club. Created in 2013, it has served as a source of Magpie news, features, match previews, reports, analysis and interviews for more than three years.

Support PON

Enjoy our content? Want to help us grow? Your donation will go a long way towards improving the site!

donate-pon.png

Meet the Team

Chris Chris Administrators
super_ram super_ram Global Moderators
DangerousSausage DangerousSausage Global Moderators
CliftonMagpie CliftonMagpie Global Moderators

Social Media

×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.