Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Supporter+
Posted

This is a complete surprise for me. I thought Notts were grooming him to be an eventual number one? Obviously not.

So are we going to have another goalkeeper coming in to fight for the number one slot?

I hope so.

  • Like 6
Posted

If true, that reads more like a permanent deal than a loan.

If the club doesn't have faith that they can work with him and help him secure the first-team place, then this is the only reason why I would support a deal which would see Tiernan Brooks leave. Otherwise, loaning him for one more season wouldn't be a bad choice, but to sell him without fully testing his ability. It would hugely disappoint me.

  • Like 5
  • Love 2
Posted

I'm sure the market value of Tiernan is higher than Gateshead could afford? Perhaps Notts will have a sell on clause but Gateshead have agreed to waive the sell on clause on Macca? All speculation of course!

  • Like 6
Posted

someone on facebook has suggested he has already gone but i cant see anything confirming it.

i think it would be a disappointment but it makes sense to allow tiernan brooks go and get the experience he needs to play first team football. we have signed alex bass, he seems to be looking likely to be our future keeper for some time. only issue i have, is we dont really know how good brooks could be.

allowing him to go out on loan is one thing but if he ends up being sold this season, i would be disappointed we did not test him more last year.

  • Like 7
Posted

It would be a letdown if the club, which seemed to be grooming him for the future, didn’t give the lad a fair chance. I hope this isn’t true, as it would be quite disheartening.

 

  • Like 8
Posted

People are saying on Twitter that it’s already happened, but I can’t find anything on the Gateshead page. There’s no news on their website either, and Tiernan Brooks hasn’t said anything. So, what’s the missing piece here?

  • Like 5
  • Love 1
Posted

yeah, i am seeing that too.

it does not seem to be official yet, maybe somewhere else has said it has happeed?

  • Like 2
  • Surprised 1
  • Sad 2
Posted

I’ve not seen any solid evidence yet. I’m certain that if there was any news, someone here would have spotted it. So, for now, let’s consider it as just rumours. We need to wait for an official announcement. Until then, I don’t have much to add. I just think Tiernan Brooks is a promising player and sitting on the bench or being loaned out isn’t doing him any good.

  • Like 7
Posted

If they are aware of the situation, why aren’t they revealing their sources? Or where the confirmation of the move is located? They might be basing their statements on rumours. I’m feeling let down, but I would be pleased for Tiernan Brooks.

  • Like 7
Posted

Maybe the club just doesn’t feel he’s developed enough and the National League is his level? 

  • Like 6
Posted
16 minutes ago, yelobeli said:

Maybe the club just doesn’t feel he’s developed enough and the National League is his level? 

This is a possibility, in addition to having signed a 26-year-old who seems to be ready to grow further as a League Two keeper. Alex Bass always seems likely to be number one for us and should grow into the role. I sympathise with Aidan Stone, but I believe Tiernan Brooks would have been a better choice as the backup for Sam Slocombe.

Yet it does no purpose to have him hanging around if he won't be played regularly.

  • Like 8
Posted

well i think with sam slocombes repeated injuries and the fact aidan stone falls to pieces when he concedes, it looked promising for tiernan brooks to be given a shout in the cup matches and in rotation in the league if needed.

  • Like 6
Posted

Poor Decision by the Club if this is True. Tiernan Brooks and Alex Bass pushing Each other for the Number 1 Jersey, would be a Good Thing. Being unchallenged for your Position within the First Team makes a Player become Lazy with a I Don't Care Attitude, knowing the only way he'll be Replaced is if he's injured. No Disrespect To Sam Slocombe but at 36 his career is starting to wined Down and Alex (I would think) would be looking for someone to keep him on his Toes and Challenge Him for his Place Between the Posts.

  • Like 7
Posted

Gutted if it is the case that he's departing Notts. Been saying for a couple years now that he deserved some sort of opportunity at Notts especially last season given our goalkeeping woes. Even if he doesn't play regular football and is used as a back up, it would still be useful to have for that just incase moment of a red card, injury or even replacing an out of form keeper. 

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
Posted

People often take tweets as truths. As of now, I see no basis to trust it since no official announcement has been made. I don’t believe there’s a significant opportunity for him in the first team, but he could potentially be a future asset. If he’s left, I can accept it. However, if he’s still here, a loan might be a more sensible choice given our other alternatives.

  • Like 4
Posted

@BromPie

Agree. The only tweets I believe as truths before official confirmation are those made by Fabrizio Ramano as he is well informed and what he's tweeted or mentioned get officially confirmed days or weeks later. I know that's slightly off topic from the Brooks situation. On the loan front you've mentioned, how many more loans can we send him out for before he's given a chance or it's time to sell up as he's constantly out on loan? He most definitely should be considered as a future asset. 

  • Like 2
Posted

What I find puzzling, if this is indeed true, is that Notts have promoted him as a future prospect. They’ve created a situation where most fans are eager to see him get a chance, which is unusual for a young goalkeeper.

I’ve noticed that some people are now calling for him, but a few months ago, I doubt we would have seen this. If they let him go without giving him a proper chance, it seems less likely that we will ever start giving young players a chance unless they immediately excel, which is highly unlikely at our level.

  • Like 3
  • Love 1
Supporter+
Posted

Notts have confirmed Tiernan's permanent departure.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

It’s very hard balance, I think everyone wants to see more academy players in the first team but I don’t think fans would want it at the expense of a competitive team. This is where you have to trust the coaches who see these players every day, if they feel they are ready then they have to be brave and give them a chance.

I don’t think Tiernan was the answer, right now, to our goal keeping issues. He was also injured a bit last season and in his short spell with Rochdale it’s hard to find many comments about his time there. But if their fans had desperately wanted him to go back, we would have known about it. He’s still young though and needs the game time, maybe another season out on loan just didn’t enthuse him - we can’t send him out on loan forever! It’s a shame, I hope he does well at Gateshead, he could well return one day in the future…

  • Like 3
Posted

Mark Crossley used his persuasive skills to successfully convince Notts to sign Tiernan Brooks, following his release from Sheffield Wednesday's academy.

The high hopes we gained for Brooks came from seeing him praised by virtually everyone. The club became wrapped up with trying to push him over the line to become our first team keeper but were never really keen to give him that chance. It's been nice to see someone, like Tiernan gain the support because he has done well. I know Rochdale fans who were keen to see him join them, which I am sure they'll be disappointed about.

When Brooks managed to get into the team due to injuries etc, I think it came via a lot of fan pressure and I thought he did well.

It's better for his career that he now has made the move to become a number 1 keeper, whereas here he most likely wouldn't. At least not until things changed, it's disappointing in one hand because we never give youngsters any real chance, but it's hard to deny them a chance to flourish when an opportunity comes calling.

  • Like 3
Posted

I am so sorry to see Tiernan go... but it also says a lot that Stone is still here. 

I hope Notts have a sell on clause because I believe Tiernan will become good

  • Like 3
Posted

Gutted he has gone. Along the lines of what others have said,  I thought  Notts were perhaps going to give him an opportunity this season. But after they signed Bass, i think he would potentially have been a good number two. Now we have an aging keeper and A keeper that can't dive for back up.  

  • Like 4
Supporter+
Posted

We've had two strange decisions by Notts this week first Tiernan, now Kyle.

I hope Notts are going to bring in further players as replacements for these two that are leaving.

  • Like 3
Posted

Very strange from Notts. We brought in Stone whereas we would've been better off having Tiernan in there, especially when or season had been over for weeks before the end. 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About PON

Pride of Nottingham

Pride of Nottingham is an independent fansite devoted to Notts County, the world’s oldest professional football club. Created in 2013, it has served as a source of Magpie news, features, match previews, reports, analysis and interviews for more than three years.

Support PON

Enjoy our content? Want to help us grow? Your donation will go a long way towards improving the site!

donate-pon.png

Meet the Team

Chris Chris Administrators
super_ram super_ram Global Moderators
DangerousSausage DangerousSausage Global Moderators
CliftonMagpie CliftonMagpie Global Moderators

Social Media

×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.