Jump to content

tiernan brooks as the backup keeper, would you?


liampie

Recommended Posts

a fan on facebook mentioned to me that he would have brooks as the backup and not sign a third goalkeeper. i think it would generate an interesting conversation as it is an area where we could save a bit of money whilst giving game time to a player that would only get better. would you have tiernan brooks as the backup keeper?

Quote

I wouldn’t bother with a backup keeper, as I’d make the young Brooks as actual backup.

the only concern i have is those fans who are impatient and angry, a keeper needs to be confident and they are always open to heavy criticism which might be to much for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question. I'd certainly like to see him in action, FA Trophy games and the qualifying rounds of the FA Cup would be a good starting point. But if Slocombe got a injury early in the season that meant he'd be out for a while I think it would be too early for him... But then I'm saying this having never seen him play, so who knows maybe he'd come in a do well! 

If you want to develop a player you either have to play him or loan him out so he can get game time. I think IB said he wanted 3 keepers so maybe there would be scope to send Brooks on loan to a team in the divisions below.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally would guarantee him game time against certain teams, I am not sure I feel as "backup" would be wise - as Sam Slocombe most likely will miss some games due to injury. However, it sounds like Jake Kean might be the fallback option which I would be perfectly happy with.

Provided he agrees to wear the shirt when required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chasing promotion? I wouldn't leave him as backup.

If Jake Kean plays as the backup and Tiernan Brooks as the optional keeper than I am happy with that, as @Chris pointed out. I think it would be easier to answer if we had seen him play in goal for the first-team, that might be enough to sway my opinion in favour but because getting out of this league is of great importance. Playing a rookie keeper could cost us those points that might make all the difference come the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most clubs have a fill in type keeper who only starts if the main keeper is injured, at this level it would be a luxury to have 2 good keepers.

I mean its not like switching keepers give you a tactical advantage over the opposition, but it is important game time is given to young players. I have no issue with him as backup, I would be more concerned if Sam Slocombe had gone and the suggestion was to make him the first choice option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its time Notts started to blood in the youth players, there is talk about loans but I think slowly settling in players who are capable of improving game by game is a must. If he can make 5 or more appearances it's a start.

Then send him out on loan to a club that will guarantee him a start more regularly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

About PON

Pride of Nottingham

Pride of Nottingham is an independent fansite devoted to Notts County, the world’s oldest professional football club. Created in 2013, it has served as a source of Magpie news, features, match previews, reports, analysis and interviews for more than three years.

Support PON

Enjoy our content? Want to help us grow? Your donation will go a long way towards improving the site!

donate-pon.png

Meet the Team

Chris Chris Administrators
super_ram super_ram Global Moderators
DangerousSausage DangerousSausage Global Moderators
CliftonMagpie CliftonMagpie Global Moderators

Social Media

×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Pride of Nottingham uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. To approve, simply continue using the site or click 'I accept' Terms of Use.