Notts Countyβs form in the EFL League Two 2023/24 season has been a bit of a rollercoaster. After a disappointing defeat to Sutton on the opening day, the team seemed to have found their footing with a strong start to the season. However, recent defeats, particularly the home loss to Mansfield, have been a cause for concern.
The teamβs performance at Meadow Lane has generally been strong, with the crowd support undoubtedly playing a part. However, the Mansfield game was a disappointment and highlighted some of the issues that Notts County faces away from home.
In terms of goal scoring and conceding stats, itβs clear that the pressure of conceding is impacting our attack. Despite this, Notts County has shown they are capable of scoring when they need to.
The current form of the team heavily relies on players like Jodi Jones, John Bostock, and Macaulay Langstaff. Matt Palmer also deserves a mention, despite some inconsistent performances.
Looking ahead to the upcoming fixtures against Gillingham and Newport, itβs hard to predict how many points weβll pick up. The pressure of being at the top end of the table may be impacting the teamβs performance.
Overall, while there are certainly areas for improvement, itβs important to remember that no team can win every game. The most important thing is that Notts County continues to enjoy their football and plays to the best of their ability.
A very balanced and sensible criticism @DangerousSausage.From what I saw in the highlights ,a case of 'on another day'
I think we need to mix things up a bit.Β I don't have a problem with the short corners, but not all the time.Β We don't have the height to launch it into the centre, but there are other options other than the short pass.Β At the end they stuck 3 / 4 men about 7 yards from the corner and immediately pressured the receiver, and the next man forcing us back to Slocombe. Occasionally putting one long or to the edge of the box would give them something else to think about and mean they couldn't commit so many men to the short corner.Β Mind you, their corners were just as successful as ours resulting in 0 goals, but we often came away with the ball, so at least we retained possession, but ....
When we attacked we did so exclusively down the wings. Wrexham doubled up on Nemane and sometimes had 3 on Jones, which restricted their effectiveness.Β I think it was a reflection of how good Jones is that he still caused so many issues.Β Β The trouble was that when things came to a halt on one wing the ball was recycled back through the midfield, defence and on to the other wing.Β Wrexham simply drifted their defence from one wing to the other.Β There was soooo much space in the centre but we never exploited it, we simply continued our pattern of switching wing to wing.Β This meant Wrexham moved their central defence out to support the full backs and double up on our wingers without fear of being exposed in the centre.Β Sometimes they were moving in anticipation of the move stalling on one wing, and leaving huge gaps.Β They sort of formed a dome around their penalty box and allowed us to pass around the top of it, knowing we were never going to make a move through the centre.Β I think we missed Ruben for once, who would see the gap and have the confidence to exploit it. Crowley and McGoldrick didn't do that as they were tracking over to help the wingers... because they were under pressure and needed 'an out' because Wrexham didn't need to commit to the centre.Β Against Gillingham, Macari exploited the gap when it appeared, but nobody seemed to want to take the risk this time.
My last point was that Wrexham were more prepared to take a shot and take a chance that something would come of it.Β We seemed to want to score the perfect goal,Β Their approach led to the deflection and indirectly the second goal (I maintain if thy hadn't scored the first they wouldn't have got the second). Sometimes, it's worth losing possession to give the opposition something else to think about, or roll the dice to see if something different happens.Β Β
All that said, it was a good game between 2 closely matched teams.Β we will both be there or thereabouts at the end of the season. I thought our defence was largely sound and Solcombe was excellent. We were let down by those up front, but nothing to get despondent about.Β We are still learning and we will improve.Β If we can learn the lesson and be a little less predictable as a result of this experience then I can see us being right up there.
Β
I read all the comments here whilst I was away and, I looked at the score updates - feeling like 0-0 could actually be a Sometimes, what appears to be a negative situation can actually turn out to be a Sometimes, what seems like a misfortune can actually be a stroke of luck. Then we were 1-0, quickly 2-0 and I thought it was obvious when we get pushed, we lack a defender who is of the mould of Mike Edwards.
I've felt this a few times, but none of our defenders offer the level of awareness, communication, organisation that he offered.
In January, I would hope that Notts can find a defender who offers everything outlined but as for the result. We'll go again; this season is going to see us have results like this, and we need to avoid knee-jerk reactions that linger on.
As for the video, so much waffle that makes it incredibly boring to listen too. It's a shame because there's some valid and interesting comments, but it's got that irritant which comes from people who are trying to force humour and failing miserably. Also, I think the overall performance and teams were better in the National League. Poor teams stand out by miles in this league, but it is a valid point that most do look like they deserve to be here.